Fundamental defects in the Pakistani soul

I was watching the rather acerbic take on Pakistani diplomats by Gravitas News on YouTube.  It seems most are involved in scam or another , usually defrauding the host country or even fleecing their own. So much so that at one point the U.S State Department prevented Pakistani representatives from travelling unescorted. There was also a video of a Pakistani diplomat stealing the wallet of  his Kuwaiti counterpart which was lying on  table.

I was also amazed by the footage of Imran Khan personally chauferring the rulers of Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Generally such level of prostrating and self inflicting humiliation on part of rulers is reserved for religious figures or older revered people. And this expected to some degree and appreciated by the public. The Raja of Ramnad who sponsored Swami Vivekananda's trip to America, personally pulled the ceremonial chariot carrying Vivekananda instead of the bullocks.  Of course there are also those kings who actually offered their wives to sages so they would impregnate them. In America, many Catholic politicians often prostrate and kiss the hand of the visiting Pope. This alarms Protestants , evangelicals in particular, so much so that when John F Kennedy was running for President he had to verbally assure various Protestant heads that he would be loyal not to the Pope but the Constitution.

But a head of state becoming a chauffer to a visiting foreign counterpart is bizarre. Of course again this is context specific. If this was Norway, where the king rides around the capital in a bycicle and drives his own car without a chauffer, it would not raise any eyebrows if he personally drove a foreign dignitary. As this is expected in a very egalitarian society such as theirs.
Neither Pakistan, Qatar not KSA are egalitarian in any meaningful sense of the term. And Pakistanis (and Indian) comprise the bulk of the working class population . Therefore the PM of Pakistan offering himself in a servile position only highlights the subservient nature of the Pakistani state.

A lot of this has to do with the Pakistani identity crisis which in turn is the result of their history which is really one of total subjugation from the Persians around 400 B.C to the Macedonians, Indo Greeks, Scythians, Huns,Arabs, followed by a sucession of Turks from Ghaznavids to Moghuls finished off by the British Raj. This is a country which did not see a son of its soil lead it for about 2500 years. Hence they have developed a sort of Stockholm Syndrome with regard to these countries.
Pakistanis grovel over Arabs, Turks and Persians in particular . While they have almost surrendered themselves to the good graces of China. Not a lot of Khans ,Butts or Ismails on the Board of the Pakistani Stock Exchange but there is no shortage of Jiangs, Lees, Chengs.

For a while I believed Pakistani propaganda(mostly because it was filtered through fake accounts and profilse pretending to be other nationalities) that Turks loves Pakistani food and culture and Arab admire Pakistani military might or that Persians view Pakistanis as continuing their heritage. None of these are accurate. Turks in general are blissfully unaware of Pakistan. Pakistanis indeed are recruited in Bahrain and Yemen but apart from the talented combat pilots(Pakistani pilots and Special Forces are most likely better than Indian's) they are mostly cannon fodder . It is bizarre that a country offers its soldiers to another to fight its wars.  Persians view Pakistanis as somewhat downmarket and riff raff due to their negative experience with Pakistani merchants. Much less view them as literary and aesthetic sophisticates.

This is another aspect of Pakistanis that is so bizarre- their pathological instinct to lie and commit fraud. They lie even when they dont need to. They lie even when the truth will serve them better.
They have a tendency to love bomb- if you meet a Pakistani, specifically Punjabi- they will turn the charm to a 100 even as they just met you. Complimenting you in a myriad of ways. I was  immunized to this lot from junior high school when I interacted with Dubai. So I was safe but a lot of people were not and easily fell for their scams and deceits.

Indians too can be ingratiating ,often in a servile manner but it is usually due to a genuine effort to please and impress foreigners. Not to scam them. Of course such people do exist in India but such behavior is not considered acceptable. In Pakistani culture, it is de riguer.

Apart from this, they have constant need to be bailed out by various countries. Of course those who do bail them out such as UAE are quickly stabbed in the back for countries such as Turkey which did little for Pakistan. UAE helps and continues to help Pakistan to the tune of billions of $ but Pakistan supported Istanbul for Expo2020 rather than Dubai. Perhaps this is because it saw Turkey was the new emerging economic superpower (or it seemed at the time in 2013). This is the problem with servile,amoral people with no identity- they possess neither gratitude, self respect or loyalty. As a result their only identity is that they anti India-an itself comical notion since India itself is a new identity whose current form is based alternately on Garibaldiesque athiest Hindutva or national Nehruvian secularism. Both of which are ultimately alien to Indic civilization.

While a Pakistani identity does exist and admittedly makes more sense than the India identity- Pakistan is comprised of one dominant religion and a few ethnic groups most of whom are inter related to a degree- it is still fragile and easily collapses since it is a hollow shell lacking only a rudimentary instinct for self assertion. And it wastes in its covert and proxy wars against India which only further highlights it lack of character.

I dont believe that Pakistani Hindus are any better than Muslims in this regard. As my previous post showed these particular are dominant in Bollywood and the military- the sorry results are there for all to see.

Karna said this to Salya about then Pakistanis of that era- Madras, Saindhavas



There are no good feelings in a Madraka. He is inferior in words and is the worst among men. A Madraka is always inferior in his soul. He always lies and is never straight. We have heard it said that wickedness exists among Madrakas.

We have heard it said that wickedness exists among Madrakas. Fathers, mothers, sons, mothers-in-law, fathers-in-law, maternal uncles, sons-in-law, daughters, brothers, grandsons, kin, friends, others who have arrived, male servants and female servants mingle together. Noble women, according to their own wishes, mingle with men, known and unknown. In their homes, even the better ones always eat coarse grain and other undesirable food. They drink liquor, 384 eat the flesh of cows and dance and laugh.


If asked for collyrium, a Madraka woman scratches her buttocks and unwilling to give it, speaks these terrible words. “No. I will not give any collyrium. I would rather give my beloved instead. On every occasion, I will give up my son. But I will not give the collyrium.”


That is what is generally heard. I, and others, are capable of recounting many such things about them, from the ends of their hair to the tips of their toes. How can the Madrakas and the Sindhu-Souviras know about dharma? They have been born in a wicked country.


The comments about liquor and beef  and women laughing(??) are probably inserted by Gupta era conservative editors.
We have Karna considers Madra and Saindhava( Western Punjabis and Sindhis) to be liars and frauds and women to be promiscuous. (I have left out the latter aspect out of politeness more than anything else)

How much has changed really?