Three "Indian" women running for 2020: None should be President

I speak of Kamala Harris, Senator from California who is half Jamaican ,half Tamil and a complete hack and incompetent. She got a break in politics by sleeping with the mayor of San Francisco, he was 60, she was 29. He admitted as much recently

Then we have Tulsi Gabbard, an American convert to Hinduism. A war veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan. Probably the most formidable of the lot. Her foreign policy instincts are sound. But American public are least interested in her loony socialist schemes in a bull economy.

Then we have Elizabeth Warren, a blond blue eyed woman whiter than the cream of milk from a cow in a Norway January who claims to have Indian(casino, not 711 or rather feather not dot) heritage. She beclowned herself by taking a DNA test and revealing that she had only 1/1024th Indian blood.

The Indian media will go into hysterics celebrating Kamala Harris.And the feminist will quickly ignore or rationalize Senator Harris sleeping her way to the top.

Problem is Kamala identifies mostly as black or rather Jamaican black of the Colin Powell mould which is not really black at all. America has this insane one drop rule of the Jim Crow era which much like the Nazi purity tests was quite severe. Basically any white who had one or two paternal grandparents who were black would be considered black. But in the Caribbean ,things were more fluid and less discrete. The elite of Jamaica and Barbados such as Colin Powell, Eric Holder were considered a sort of white than black. This is apparent from their complexions who can be paler than Italians or even as fair as Northern European though with some African features.

Colin Powell certainly didnt identify as black but requested a Scottish coat of arms featuring a lion and an eagle to highlight his highlander warrior ancestry.

So technically Ms Harris for all practical purposes is a white woman with some masala. But for the loony left running the Democratic party self identification and ideology beats racial reality not to mention diversity points seem to determine suitability for high office.
Kamala is what they call "intersectional"-black, Indian, woman, childless is a welcome bonus as much of the Democrat party is run by bitter lonely feminists.
All she has to declare herself a transgender and claim to have a wooden leg and they wont even bother with the electoral process and simply crown her the candidate to beat evil demon Trump.

Comments

  1. I was thinking the same. So Trump will trump all his opponents in 2020 and his son will be the next president after he completes eight years in power at the White House.

    But then who is at least a little bit sensible among the Democrats? Nobody?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But is not Tulsi Gabbard's father half white and half Samoan? And her mother white? How does she have Indian heritage? By way of Hinduism?

      Delete
    2. THe use of Indian was tongue in cheek to anticipate the hyper ventilations of the Indian media over these characters.
      Tulsi's connection to India is only Hinduism.

      I hope none of Trumps children end up as President, this is how dynastic rule creeps in. We saw what that did to India and TN in particular. Lets hope U.S avoids it.

      Delete
    3. Okay I did not read the tongue-in-cheek part so I did not know.

      So who is the most sensible Democrat leader today? Or are they all equally bad? What about that Joe Biden guy? Or John Kerry, I think?

      Delete
    4. Disclaimer!!! All the articles and comments that are made by the blogger (YSV RAO) and her followers should be treated as mere "opinion" not "Facts" the characterization that appears is purely fictional and satirical in nature .blogger(YSV RAO) herself is a fictional person just like her followers whose opinion doesn't matter to general public :)

      Delete
    5. ysv rao is a web bot who copy pastes from msm , it has created many fake accounts
      to troll on social media I read this bloggers articles and comments all appears to a random incoherent ramblings , all the followers are also web bots who seem to agree with everything that ysv rao comments , "machines cannot think only humans beings can" .so I suspect they are Rothschild created web bots that troll captain vadakayail sites .

      Delete
    6. asuoof030

      under the current setup of things, the probability of u being a bot is far higher than the blogger himself :) or in the other case,which is equally probable,maybe u somehow got access to the net from ur lunatic ward, ur comment above can well be a case study for psychiatrists ,as to what may happen when schizos accidentally get access to good blogs :D

      Delete
    7. Amit Mishra ,my old lost love and ,is back with that same comment of his ,probably he has rewritten this same content and his stellar observations at least a 1000 time on ysv's blog 😁😁😁

      Amit have u ever realised this,u spent trolling ysv and us,and u spent licking the ass of ur guru AV, nearly for 5 straight years now ,ever since 2014 when we first met,pranam bhai to ur consistency in dick sucking and ass licking 😊🙏🙏

      Delete
    8. How can amit lick both AV and ysv rao since both have no dicks !!
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


      lets look at the scenario ysv rao = ajit vadakayil= Rothschild . poor Mishra was seduced by ysv_rao who himself is a notorious bootlicker of ajit vadakayil daily visiting captain blogs for his potbellied manboob selfie's :)it was YSV rao who increased captains Google count to 859 million views : )

      Delete
    9. You see this is the problem with conspiracy theories based purely on speculation or should I say perception. It just leads to a failure of logic, common sense and before you know it-lunacy as we can see from all these posts here from Amith Mishra avatars.

      Delete
    10. hey ysv_rao
      _ _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
      Please tell us what you are smoking, We all will give you, all our money to you and be your slaves for the rest of our lives. IAM NOT MISHRA!! your contradicting ur own words above

      Delete
    11. I just noticed your nonsense comments, I suppose google was correct to spam them.

      Delete
  2. Sir, I know this sounds awkward compared to what I said years ago but I am willing to learn Tantra Vidya whenever I get the time and I want to know where to begin. I started off with Maa Kamakhya Devi's beej mantra just today. I would like to know where to begin.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dont know either as I am not tantra practitioner and cant advise. This stuff is pretty intense. Best to choose someone quite qualified.

      Delete
    2. Okay sir. Thanks.

      I have to see if there is anybody in Tamil Nadu. I know there are plenty in Kerala. I think I will Google them out.

      Kamakhya Devi is in Assam so I have to either look for some deity nearby or I have to seek a Tantrik from Assam or West Bengal.

      Delete
    3. Regarding Tantra Vidya, it seems many gurus are there in Haridwar and Dehra Dun. So I should go to Uttarakhand and start searching.

      Maybe when I go there for work, I will consider this option. Right now I am trying to learn mantras, japas, sahasranamas and beej mantras instead. Hopefully I can get there.

      Delete
  3. Ysv

    Wonderful posts sir after a period of absence and good to see u active after a long time 😊🙏 I hope u and ur family are doing great .

    Ysv one question for u ,what is ur general opinion on Trump govt, whatever glimpses I get from Twitter doesn't look very positive about current us govt ,but u would know better on this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think USA's economy is doing well. Americans seem to be happy with Trump. If that is true, Trump will win 2020 easily. And if his son kick starts his political career, he could rule for another 8 years. But as Rao sir told me, that would be tantamount to dynastic rule.

      Delete
    2. Trump have allowed the Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller to make a mountain out a molehill when he hastily sacked the FBI Director James Comey in the early months of his administration rather simply have him replaced by one of his own picking as is the right of any incoming President. Apart from this you had the hysteria of Russia collusion which was cooked up by Hillary Clinton as revenge for her loss. This week Mueller will issue a report that he has found no evidence and will likely wrap it up
      Trump has found funding for the wall with some caveats but got 80% of what of he wanted.

      The economy is soaring, part of it due to Republican from 2010 to 2016 practically emasculating Obama from interfering in the economy. The economy provides best when it is administered least.THe tax reform acts and cutting of red tape and emphasis on drilling for coal and fossil fuels further provided fresh blood into the economy
      As it stands its a bull economy
      The Democrats have become quite mad. Now they are talking about abolishing ICE which guards the border and prosecutes immigrant criminals which include child sex traffickers and of course drug traffickers.
      Meanwhile one of the front runners , Corey Booker , a vegan speaks out the meat culture of United States. Yes best of lucking running against bacon in a general election.
      I would consider Corey Booker a honorary Indian if he was a vegetarian .Vegan is very much a Western adaptation of vegetarianism. I believe Tulsi is vegetarian or atleast does abstain during Navaratri and Deepavali
      I have heard Senator Booker is a Buddhist , am not sure. But he is African American (albeit rather light skinned like Kamala Harris, Eric holder and Barack Obama). Seems Democrat seemed to have a paper bag test for black politicians in their midst. A friend of mine back in college told me that she attended a predominantly black college in Tennessee which historically had a paper bag test. If you were darker than a paper bag you were denied admission. This was well until the 90s. She was rather light skinned black herself and hence she got in LOL
      Republicans tend to have darker skinned blacks such as Herman Caine and Dr. Ben Carson who have more impressive accomplishments

      Delete
    3. Sir I have a query.

      Those migrant caravans carrying little children and people carrying banners with flags of their native nations trying to enter USA from the southern border is a new phenomenon, right? Why are they called refugees when they are carrying banners with their flags?

      What really is happening there? And what is ICE?

      But India has a rich tradition of eating meat, right? How does being vegetarian make one a honorary Indian then?

      Though I am not a complete fan of Trump, I can say he is at least a true American as he cares for his country and ensures Americans get jobs. Though that means Indians and other foreigners missing out. But then who are others to dictate terms to USA on this matter? They decide the course of action in their country.

      Thanks.

      Delete
    4. I looked up Colin Powell. That man does not look black at all. He looks so white.

      As for Kamala Harris, her mom seems to be really dark. Her dad is almost her color if not a bit lighter.

      That aside, what makes Caribbean blacks so successful while African and even American blacks are struggling and poor? Is it just because the former follow capitalism (some Caribbean nations have no income tax and are tax havens) while the latter are enthralled by socialism and communism? Or is it a deeper malaise?

      Thanks.

      Delete
    5. Colin Powells family was part of the Jamaican elite who tend to look more white than black. Colin Powell identifies to some degree as white if he requested a Scottish coat of arms. But it seems he bought into identity politics on basis of which he supported Obama who really another elite light skinned black not of black American background.

      Kamala Harris's looks come mostly from her father it seems. Her dad is rather fair skinned, almost like a Kashmiri actually

      Caribbean blacks dont have a chip on their shoulder and have strong family values. And they appreciate the opportunities they dont have back home and take advantage of the same to become successful
      American blacks are devastated by the Great Society program where they are incentived to have single mothers and not work and get welfare for doing nothing. This leads to apathy,self hate(often projected to whites but also Asians, Indians, Hispanics etc) and a victimhood complex not to mention high crime rate

      If you discount four major cities such as LA, New Orleands, Chicago and New York with large black populations and the crime stats associated with them, the murder rate of U.S.A drops to 189th out of 193 countries. As of now it stands at number 4!
      90% of this is due to lack of a proper family structure and middle class values which the Caribbean blacks possess.

      Tax shelters such as the British Virgin Islands, Bermuda and Cayman Islands(all under the jurisdiction of Britain) are a different deal altogether. They are somewhat like Switzerland where the main source of income is finance and with a small population , there is a lot of money to go around. But the main movers and shakers are British, Dutch and Americans. Though I think Indian and Israeli bankers ,regulators and back office staff are also making inroads.
      The Indians(our Indians, not native Americans) in the Caribbean areas though tend to be dumber than a box of rocks ironically. V.S Naipaul himself from Trinidad and Tobago noticed this. I think the reason is historical and evolutionary , the British selected them not for their brains to work in these plantations but tolerance for drudgery.
      Those in South Africa are more successful because they were white collar folk to begin with
      Tamil laborers in Malaysia and Singapore were similar to Caribbean Indians except I believe they had good role models in Sri Lankan and Indian Tamils as well as Lee Kuan Yew who encouraged them to take up English education.

      Delete
    6. That is so revealing and educational.

      I know blacks are over-represented in crime but the USA at number 4 is a real shocker. I did not know they were this bad.

      And yes, Caribbean blacks are far less susceptible to crime than their American and African counterparts.

      By the Great Society, do you mean the war on poverty started by Lyndon Johnson?

      It is really sad to see Caribbean Indians being in such a bad state of affairs. And I remember I was a fan of West Indies cricketers like Denesh Ramdin and Shivnarine Chanderpaul but that was when I was a kid.

      As for South Africa, blacks are killing whites in in a very brutal manner. I remember you mentioned somewhere that Israel supported South Africa under Apartheid. Maybe it is because both nations helped each other become nuclear powers? South Africa had 6 nuclear weapons till 1989. Israel was the only country that stood through thick and thin with South Africa. And to some extent Mauritius.

      Would it be a good idea if India turned into a tax haven itself? Or is that far fetched?

      Delete
  4. "I looked up Colin Powell. That man does not look black at all. He looks so white" --- i remember reading one paper where reasearchers found out European/White American admixtute in african americams from as low as 10% to as high as 40%. The African american population will eventually be absorbed unless there's a massive difference between TFR of african-americans and whites.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A good deal of the white DNA in African Americans is during the dark days of slavery when slave women would breed with male slave owners to have light skinned children who would work in the house, and recieve special benefits that those working in the field couldnt. Hence Malcolm X derided any black who sided with the oppressive U.S govt and their attitudes as a "house negro". But the flip side is that that many white indentured servants were treated far worse than blacks. The difference between a slave and an indentured servant is the timeline of their servitude. Slaves remain slaves till they die and even their children are slaves by default. Indentured servitude lasts any period from a year to 10 years generally. Historians have noted that the difference of treatment to the analogy of buying a car and renting one. Of course you would take a lot more of your own car and would be very neglectful and exploitative of a rented one. Hence slaves contrary to popular imagination were treated generally well in U.S as it was a very expensive investment. The damage done to slaves was not physical but psychological. This was observed not just by abolitionists but admitted by those who even wanted to maintain slavery.
      Often Irish female indentured servants were forced to mate with black slaves in order to produce a hardy hybrid race.
      Irish were treated like such trash due to their Catholicism and peasant background in Ireland and the East coast that their position in society wasnt much better than blacks. Of course since they were white they had the option of passing of as other more respectable whites such as English,Scottish, Dutch or French.
      When and where the racial laws were lax lots of black men married Irish women and this could be another factor in the often high European DNA in black Americans

      The fertility rate in blacks would be higher if they werent disproportionately represented as being aborted at much higher rates than whites. White and black evangelical Christians consider this a horror . But white nationalists couldnt be bothered and silently cheer it as reducing the black population. Most white nationalist arent Christian, in fact contrary to Hindutva imagination, many white racists hate Christianity as they see it as promoting racial tolerance and diversity
      There was actually a black economist who got in a bit of hot water when he stipulated that the decline in crime in the 1990s was mostly due to a relative lack of young black men due to them being aborted since it started in the 1970s.

      Delete
    2. the above comment is a lie 'big lie', a hoax ,a false assumption even a false conclusion

      Delete
    3. what nonsense are you talking?

      Delete
  5. Sir I have a query.

    Aside of the three aforementioned women, does the Democrat party wish to field that AOC woman for POTUS anytime soon? Her rise to power seemed to be very fast but her agenda seems to be insane. I am not aware of how American democracy works so I ask.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In order to run for President, one has to be atleast 35 years of age. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (AOC), a former bartender, is just 29. She was elected almost by a fluke due redistricting of a part of New York City where the area is now majority Puerto Rican so she ran on the Democrat primary against a legacy white guy and she was the only Puerto Rican running and hence she got the nomination. Once she got the nomination she was shooin for office since no one bothers to vote Republican in that district, it is the equivalent of voting for BJP in 1990s Chennai.
      Being young, female, ethnic and photogenic, she checks all the boxes for the mentally handicapped millenial crowd who are interested in having the right intersectionality rather than any ability to pass policy. She achieved fame with her snarky comments on twitter and instagram video stream where you can see her stream of consciousness sans filter considering banning citizens from reproducing for sake of the environment while she is ironing or cooking
      To this end her Green New Deal proposal is a complete and utter joke which recommends reducing air travel and building inter oceanic rails and mandating the cows stop farting(as the methane creates global warming).
      Her credibility ,power and popularity suffered a major blow with that policy proposal.
      During the same week ,she managed to alienate Amazon.com from New York City as they considered setting up shop there potentially creating 25000 jobs paying an average income of 60000$ starting hiring a lot of blacks and Hispanics. She objected and abused them as they were going to recieve subsidies worth 3 billion dollars. In her economically illiterate view she assumed a subsidy is a cash handout rather the equivalent in tax discounts, utilities, rental space , permit fees etc
      BTW she is a graduate in economics from Boston University which does make you wonder about the state of education these days

      Delete
    2. This bad at 29 is unbelievable!

      I came to know of her because some people were sharing her videos and news articles hailing them as visionary. I got curious especially after seeing her proposal of 70% tax on the super rich so I asked.

      Mandating that cows stop farting? What is she smoking? How can animals consciously control their bodily functions?

      I did not know Amazon were kicked out of New York. This is indeed stunning. If she wants to build inter oceanic rails, she needs money right? Without Amazon and others investing, where will she get it?

      I never knew American universities produced such substandard stuff like AOC. I thought they were always good and had quality so the high cost of education. Stunned.

      Delete
  6. I know this is just a lighthearted article so it's not really necessary to point this out, but you mentioned that "Tulsi's connection to India is only Hinduism."

    But even that connection to Hinduism is only through a convert with his own offshoot of ISKcon of which he's the guru of. On top of that, even ISKcon's founder seemed to alternately declare or deny the sects own Hinduism when convenient. Generally he found gaudiya vaishnavism to be too good to be Hindu. I'm personally of the belief that Prabhupada was a clown and an embarrassment for Hinduism, so I wish his more distancing comments would stick enough to end the association between ISKcon and Hinduism.

    But whatever. Tulsi's not winning this election. She's too centrist on border issues, and she's too dependent on retorting any criticism by stating her military service. Overusing that rhetoric makes it a double edged sword. Also the videos of Tulsi dancing to her guru's chants are enough to scare off a lot of bible belt Christians. To you Indians it probably looks like nothing much, but through American eyes I know how insane it looks to most here.

    She's by far the most sane candidate in the democratic party, but their only chance at winning right now is by solidarity with their most insane members. And that too will most likely lose the election.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didnt know about her ISKCON connection but apparently her mother is Hindu and gave their children Hindu names such as Vrindavan and Janmashtami is a big deal. Vrindavan and Janmashtami points to a Krishna sectarian preference.

      Please realize that it is normal and desirable for Hindu politicians to attend poojas and havans but dancing up and down at guru is not something the public looks too kindly on. Even in India, guru and cult like behavior is viewed with suspicion.

      Another problem for Tulsi is the Hawaii connection. No one in mainland U.S take Hawaii seriously. Just as they dont take Nevada, Florida or to some extant California. These are viewed as flighty, eccentric places which do not yield individuals with gravitas.

      Tulsi has stuck to her guns on foreign policy but surrendered on other issues such as gay marriage which she was against not too long ago.

      Yes Prabhupada was a fool who didnt know what he was talking about. He spoke of taking the Vedas literally! hahahaha

      Delete
  7. Tulsi has a brother named Aryan, which in USA is amazing. The Jewish population here is so frantically hell bent on making themselves out to be victims of something at every moment of every day that I'm surprised the media hasn't asked her to denounce her brother and or her parents for giving him that name.

    "He spoke of taking the Vedas literally!" I think he wanted to take the Vedas literally, only that by "Vedas" he meant his Bengali interpretation of the Vedas through the lens of the Bhagvat Purana, as interpreted by himself. He claims Krishna is talked about in the Vedas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think most people know now the different contexts behind the word Aryan and symbol Swastika. Though you did have idiots like Glenn Beck a few years aghast that Persia renamed itself it Iran(a cognate of Aryan) in 1930s ! Never mind Iran/Persia before during this time was the most Jewish friendly country in the middle east. A low bar, I know but its still something.
      A vocal shrill part of leftist Jews , most of whom dont even believe in god, forget about keeping kosher even eating pork, are overrepresented in the media. Ironically the same sort before about 20 years ago wished to keep their Jewishness private. Look at many of the older sitcoms such as Friends and Mad About You. The central characters are obviously Jewish but hardly ever mentioned openly. Even Seinfeld, whose central character is Jewish isnt observant, eats pork. The extant of his Jewishness is his parents getting outraged because he was making out with his girlfriend in theater when Shindlers list was playing.

      Anyway nowadays the Pokemon points for victimhood are ever in flux one day it is black, another day trans, another day Muslim and another Sikh or Hindu. Mostt of the people tune it out.

      Krishna is mentioned not in the Vedas per se but in the Chandogya Upanishad as Devakiputra.
      Another Krishna is mentioned in the Rg Veda but he is not of the royal family or associated with pastoralism but is a sage of the Angiras clan. Obviously these are two different people
      But that doesnt stop our Vaishnava supremacists friends from over speculating.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Circumstantial evidence of Chandragupta Maurya's victory over the Macedonians

Ajit Vadakayil: Deranged lunatic

Ajit Vadakayil: What is he?