Attention wokes : Ignore Afghans, Iraqis, Syrians, Palestinians etc. They deserve their fate

 

I dont believe in reparations or historic vendettas. What your or other ancestors did in the past , no matter how horrific, should not have bearing on what the type of person you are today.  Some like the descendents of Hitler (on his sisters side) disagree and they have vowed not to have any more children lest whatever wicked gene they percieve what responsible for this actions would be propagated. Rather silly since Hitler wasnt really an objectionable individual in his youth. The turning point in his life when he discovered that Germany had lost WWI while recovering from his wounds on that battlefield which sent him into a state of semi psychosis from which he arguably never recovered.

One thing I do believe in and do not object to is - karma. A country or people can recover from the evils their ancestors have commited if they repent and endure grief . Buddha stated that there is no greater punishment or hell for an evil man than when he is undergoing the trauma of guilt and repentence. This is the reason for the success of Europe and U.S. who are self aware and face head on their cruel and exploitative histories. The woke of course take this to an obscene level but more on them later.

Yes, one can escape karma by offering repentence but what of those who are proud of their history of conquest and extermination and gloat about it openly? Well those are the people that you read about in the news who are subject to unmitigated horrors for the last few decades.

Iraqis and Syrians were the basis of the Ummayad and Abbasid caliphate which oversaw destruction of various cultures across the world including the destruction of Buddhist , Christian and Zoroastrian cultures in Central Asia and Iran today. Not to mention of course repeated invasions into India, but had to be content with Western Punjab and Sindh. Apart from reducing non Arabs to dhimmi status( initially Arabs didnt care much to convert others to Islam)

Do any of the Arabs from these countries on average feel any sort of shame or embarassment of this history. Au contraire ! They revel in it and gloat about it. Same goes for Afghans who are proud of their involvement in the subjugation of India by the Ghazni, Ghorids, Mughals, Khiljis et al.

And what is their situation today? Yeah....but you may say- Raogaru arent you being cruel yourself when you such things and enjoy their suffering? 

No I dont gloat over what they are going through. I have good friends from some of these countries. My father used to work in Iraq in Saddams era and he tried his best to smuggle his secretary's family out of the country to safe harbor for the better part of a decade and failed. We still dont know their fate, something that weighs heavily on all of us. 

My point is simply this- karma is like a force of nature. The deranged woke types in India or the West who weep over people who have all sorts of superiority complexes over them are basically standing in front of a cyclone or a volcano with overflowing lava with a hand up ordering it to stop. 

I cannot begin to fathom the level of stupidity and arrogance of Indians in particular who weep over conflicts in far away Middle East. When there is no shortage of social problems within their own country. Such as India leading in the largest number of slaves for starters. Chhatrapati Shivaji(who banned slavery of Tamils to the Dutch) weeps. I can understand if they are Muslim or Christian(the fate of Christians in Syria and Iraq is of deep interest to Keralite Christians most of whom belong to the SYRIAN orthodox church). But woke Hindus wailing over what is occurring in Gaza for me is just comical. These people will also take a beating of some sort in their lives. Indeed if you come across activists, they are often the most miserable and unhealthy people you will find. They often die early of cancer. This is simly due to them standing in the way of psychic forces in order to fight battles which are not their's. Atleast mercenaries get renumeration for wars, heck they are far more spiritually clean than these activists.

The woke in U.S,U.K and India are usually spoiled upper middle class or rich kids who are as good as history,geography and politics as that Bihari topper girl a few years ago who believed politics was about culinary pursuits. We all had a good laugh at her expense. But she was just a silly young girl who cheated in an exam and got caught. What is the excuse of these college educated sorts with masters and PhD degrees who know literally nothing? 

The more darker aspect is that the more you look into these family history of these woke types, the more likely you are to find slave holdings, opium trading in China, speculators in times of famine,war profiteers and the like. That is the source of much of their wealth. I dont see them giving up their own luxurious lifestyle and setting up shop in a slum. But oh how they love to play act being poor, such as joining an NGO in third wold country while demanding a salary and lifestyle befitting their status. After half hearted attempts to dig a well in Sudan or cooking some fish in Dharavi , they pat themselves on the back on a job well done and boast about it on social media to fulfill their virtue in their gated community via their late model iphone.

Wokeness stems from a terror of the karma that is befalling these peoples but since the fatal flaw of wokeness is the lack of understanding human nature. Their mania for Year Zero cancel culture, which would alarm even Pol Pot, is based on a thorough ignorance of not just academic and cultural disciplines of psychology, sociology, history,geography, arts literature,drama and music but also a lack of basic social interactions and relations with other humans. Furthermore while not all liberals are woke , all woke are liberals. My problem with liberals ,despite empathizing with many of their views, is simply this- they dont seem to understand the idea of consequences. The famous New York Times headline "Despite draconian imprisonment policy, crime level drops" gives you an ideal of this mentality. Same goes for economics as they are constantly shocked when there is an improvement in the economy due to a lowering of taxes and regulations.

Wokes being liberals dont understand consequences. But woke are a special case. Atleast liberals understood causes. Karl Marx Das Capital is actually rather astute on the pitiful and degraded plight of the average worker in the Industrial revolution. Of course being a (proto leftist) his policies lead to disaster due to not understanding the effects. Wokes understand neither cause nor consequence. They not only do not realize why the average non Muslim doesnt like Muslims but also doesnt seem to understand that importing hordes of Muslims in a liberal country will not bode well for gays and women. It is this utter lack of reflection and subconscious fear of karma due to their own toxic privilege( which they project onto others) that their approach to these geopolitical disasters are not only wrong on a rational ,objective basis but also for themselves.

The captain,though not woke in the usual sense spends considerable time grieving over drone strikes in Pakistan, is one example of this and we can see his degradation in real time. Another tragic example is a frequent poster on this site whose love for all sorts of Muslim tyrants and terrorist groups led to various dissasociative disorders.



Comments

  1. Ysv

    Whether or not i get the time to comment nowadays,i keep reading ur new posts just for that humour filled sharp edge in ur writing ,take a bow sir 🙏😀

    Ysv u would know better but i think while in India the wokes are a totally outcast fringe group with no real influence on society,the same is probably not true anymore for western nations. Recently i was seeing a video from some town in America where not a single white person could comment freely on a strangely dressed Mexican type guy(this guy dressed up just for fun and as a social experiment ), the white people asked on video kept replying in woke style that the guy had all freedom to look like what he wanted,his gender shouldn't be assumed etc . While the blacks,Mexicans or maybe Hispanics told in clear terms that the guy was looking silly in his outfit. Now this was a small town in America but probably wokes have been successful in infiltrating . In contrast, here in India the commoners are completely insulated from woke propaganda as real life is a bit harder here i can presume,apart from the fact that indian population routinely gets reality checks through political corruption and problems of religious demography change in many areas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you JAM. Happy new year to you

      yes wokeness is a pursuit of the idle whites and "bhadralok" acrros all regions in India. The average "sub altern" be he Madiga, Mala, Pariah,Valmiki or Latino and black is too busy working and enjoying life to participate in this mania.
      Nowadays the hysteria for transgenderism threatens to completely alienates leftist parties from the voting base. These communities tend to have more traditional values than privileged classes. Note the divide between the critics(almost all are woke) and the average persons rating of the black comedian Dave Chapelle where he skewers every ethnic and sexual group including white,black, trans, gay and what have you. Seems like an equal opportunity offender but this was simply unnacceptable to the woke mob. The mostly white critics demanded that he conform to pro trans but he refused and mocked them some more.
      Following the U turn theory of politics, I believe the next white supremacist group will arise from the woke whites because their new god now is trans and if blacks dont fall in line, well they will try to mete out the same treatment that the KKK (an armed wing of the Democratic party) did to blacks until the 70s.

      Delete
    2. Ysv

      A very happy new year to u too 🙏😊

      Looking at the western world it seems that focussing solely on economy alone might take a toll one or two generations down the line when u come up with a youth population with dubious values like wokes. I feel it's very essential for economically progressive govts to focus on cultural conservatism not merging into fanaticism ofcourse,like the talibans etc. Wrt to india Gujarat and Tamil Nadu might be two examples of cultural conservatism coupling with economic progress in the Indian context.

      Delete
  2. Hi YSA. What is your opinion on Abraham Eralys books on Mughals and Delhi Sultanate? Also, what are the books that you read recently which impressed you (across genres)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dont prefer to dwell on Mughal and Delhi sultanates anymore. Been saturated with stuff since I was a child. Keep in mind I grew up in Hyderabad and lived in Muslim countries and had Muslim friends.
      If you want the real skinny on how the Muslim elite lived in such luxury
      http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tlmr/ch5.htm
      http://voiceofdharma.org/books/mssmi/

      Though KS Lal is rather unfair when accuses Muslims of incapable of innovation particularly in military technology, this is false. The Deccan sultanate had an indigenous manufacturing facility for cannons and the Mughals had a contraption where they could dissamble cannons and put them back together for easier transport and maneuvering.

      While William Dalrymple and Richard Eaton often whitewash islamic rules, their books are worth reading particularly Eatons A Social History of the Deccan.

      Delete
  3. Hi YSV,

    Visited your blog after long time. Hope you are doing good.
    How has been your interaction with Iranians. Do they have some kind of superiority complex? I have recently watched a video where Iranians where asked about how they perceive their looks to be. Many of them replied saying they think they look like Italians or Germans. As usual you can see the response of the other Arabs.

    Link to the video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfM5ga167Lw

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hahaha, what diverse array of answers from different people. Interestingly the Indian looking iranian girls said that they are more similar in culture to Indians in personality though culturally they both said they are similar to Pakistan and Afghanistan. The fairer skinned people went for Italy and Germany and they mentioned genetic similarity. While others went for Turkey ,Iraq etc
      Well one explanation is that Iran is a vast country where Farsis are a bare majority(just over 51%) with Arabs, Turks, Kurds, Afghans and even many Poles and Russians from WWII era. So a country which as neighbors from central asia, west asia, gcc with those varying ethnic origins will naturally provide such answers.
      Now with regard to being considered white, it is a complex question. Most Iranians are proud of their heritage and would prefer not adopt another culture. However if you do tell them they can pass off as white they will usually feel flattered.
      American men often spoke about this in forums that if on a date with Iranian woman , the issue of race comes he has to without fail state he considers Iranians as white though culturally distinct from the west. That is the only way he will get lucky!
      Actually do google pics of a young Khomeini and young Rafsanjani
      they look like East Europeans sans the mullah get up
      Iranians in Dubai and LA often have an attitude . Mostly because they are incredibly rich . THey along with Armenians control the real estate business in LA and various small and large businesses in Dubai until early 2010s when UAE government starting giving shias the boot and not renewing their visas.
      The iranians within Iran are actually rather nice and pleasant. Of all the middle eastern women, they are most likely to open to relationships or marriage with Indian men- whatever that is worth.

      All that said, I would rather not have any business dealings with them.

      Delete
  4. Hi YSV, Why is Indian government not pushing Sri Lankans to give autonomy to the North and East Tamil areas in Sri Lanka. This could help Modu gain goodwill in Tamil Nadu

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tamil Nadu doesnt care about Eelam Tamils. Maybe the average Tamils does to some extant but they have other more urgent priorities.
      DMK and AIDMK certainly doesnt care- they gave Rajapaksha a red carpet when he visited TN.

      Delete
  5. @YSV

    Random topic, why didn't India ask Pakistan to surrender PoK and settle the Kashmir issue once and for all after the Pakistani surrender in 1971?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry I didnt see this coment till now for some reason.
      Pakistan was in certainly a very pathetic state in December 1971 but do consider it still had the backing of U.S. India could manage to break Pakistans distant eastern wing but not much on the core territory . Just because most of the forces were focussed on Bangladesh but also Nixon though blinked in the face of Indira Gandhis resolve backpedalled his support for Pakistan in that war.
      However paks still had U.S support and Nixon was not yet weakened by Vietnam and Watergate, if the war had taken place in 1973 with all that going on,who knows, it could have been resolved.
      Also Indian economy wasnt doing too hot. Indira Gandhi was a formidable wartime leader but a very poor steward of the economy. She was already in an ignonimous position of begging Nixon for aid.
      Of course the relationship they shared is far from cordial. The words Witch and bastard were thrown around in abandon by Nixon in private conversations with Kissinger in regard to Indira Gandhi and the conflict
      https://www.foxnews.com/story/nixon-called-indira-gandhi-old-witch

      Delete
    2. @PremChand

      Apart from what YSV listed and absolutely valid points as he always makes, another underlying factor nationalist Indians do overlook is the productivity aspect of POK,Balochistan regions. Even today in 2023 pakistan is going through severe crisis of collapsing economy,so much that pro india slogans and rallies are being seen openly all over POK and Balochistan ,Sindh,golgit etc,but even today india will likely think twice before merging these regions into india even if that becomes possible without bloodshed in near future. Ofcourse if Modiji manages to pull such a thing out before 2024 he will come back with landslide victory like that of rajiv gandhi 420+ loksabha seats after Indira Gandhi's assassination,but apart from the huge political mileage it will help india in no way rather we shall have another chunk of more orthodox kind of Muslim population that will become a taxpaying burden on us. Back in 1972 war the real deal was bangladesh rather than any part of west pakistan,and it would have been far better a proposition if india rather had tried to integrate near border districts of Bangladesh like noakhali,rajshahi,undivided Nadia etc to west bengal or to mainland india as a separate substrate rather than annexing a nonprofucti e POK. These regions modern bdesh were forcefully divided off in partition from west bengal and took toll on WB economy . However nowadays i try to think like a realist not running on emotions,and i think not touching an inch of East Pakistan land use helped india in a different way,it has given her the image of diplomatic fairness and high Trust amongst our neighbours and across the developing world in general :) it's not always a good proposition to grab things,rather sometimes leaving aside might help u more in long run,it goes as much in national life as in our personal lives.

      Delete
    3. Btw if u are interested,do search up the Shanti bahini and bangabhumi movement history (banga sena of 90s era), iirc shanti bahini was Buddhist separatism movement in Bangladesh and bangabhumi movement by banga sena was a bengali Hindu separatist revolution attempt to curb out an independent hindu nation of bangabhumi from modern bdesh,however GOI didn't give backing to these movements and this they couldn't pull it out ,rather the vajpayee govt suppressed it ruthlessly by arresting all the banga sena fugitive leaders hiding in India back in early 2000s era. Standing on date i dont blame GOI even for this,i understand that there is a time and place for pulling out things of such huge proposition and it's not good to stoke a war that u can't pull out,back then it was impossible for india to carve out separate hindu or Buddhist subnations out of bdesh ,neither was india diplomatically , economically or militarily strong enough in 90s nor was the propaganda strong enough to include mass support of bdeshi non-Muslim population. As on today india can plan about annexing pok and parts of North Western frontier because the proindia propaganda has reached dangerous levels of infiltration ,however the same was not true for bdesh back then or even till now,despite the religious sidelining the majority of bdeshi non-Muslims still don't consider a merger with india or separate nationhood to be a feasible proposition,maybe if in future bdesh also collapses economically like Pakistan they will start thinking along this line and then india can grab the chance depending on how well it pulls out the political tangle.

      Delete
    4. @JAM
      I get your point about annexing PoK being useless economically and PoK being muslim majority , but based on recent statements by people like Rajnath Singh I came under the impression that annexing PoK is still a serious objective of our government. Anyway it's fun to sit back with popcorn and watch Pakistan disintegrate.

      Delete
    5. Hi Happy New year to you Jam!
      Now regarding Bangladesh and its integration with India- I personally think that India has its plate full and should focus on the development of its existing states than add new ones
      Having said that , Bangladesh in general is far more Hindu friendly than Pakistan as we can see from their customs, traditions and even their names.
      Bangladeshi Bengali isnt heavily Persianized and Arabicized as Punjabi is
      And Bangladeshi often convert to Hinduism to marry a prospective partner or even out of religious conviction.

      Delete
    6. The Indian economy has been nearly wrecked by Modi. Thank god for some degree of federalism otherwise it would be as pathetic as Pakistan right now. However I dont think the country can survive another two terms of Modi

      I am somewhat sympathetic to Abhijit Iyer Mitras take on demonetization- it was Modis economic warfare against the baniyas who were the financial backbone of the various local shakhas of RSS.
      He wanted to be free from their clutches. And hand over more power to his gujj corporatist friends such as the Ambanis.
      India always had considerable corporate croniyism even during the Nehru Gandhi era. As portrayed accurately in Mani Ratnams Guru, Ambanis rise was mostly a revolt against that oligarchy with the help (ironically) of a socialist editor(wonderfully played by Mithun) . And now he has become the very thing he loathed.
      Same deal with what Steve Jobs saw himself in his youth vs what Apple is now.

      Delete
    7. Also forgot to mention re Indira Gandhi
      Even as Nixon had his own troubles, Indira Gandhi wasnt free of political controversy either from 1974 to 1975.
      The one thing that India had going in its favor was that it was a democracy as Pakistan was not. If India under an increasingly autocratic Indira, culminating in the emergency, had invaded POK, then there would have been very severe international pushback ,including but not limited to economic sanctions.

      Also it didnt help that Nehru purged pretty much any general such as Cariappa who wanted a more aggressive stance against Pakistan. Carriappa wanted to have lunch in Lahore in his conquering triumph . But Nehru wouldnt have any of that.

      Indira by her nature was far more aggressive than her generals.
      In the early 80s she planned a naval invasion of Mauritius as it was percieved that the Indians there were politically given the shaft. The Indian navy was on board but the Army chiefs were quite hesitant and thwarted the idea.

      Delete
    8. @Premchand Maybe I am too jaded but I dont believe that BJP is actually interested in fulfilling any of its core geopolitical or even domestic cultural promises. This applies not to just to BJP but politics in general. There is no continuing mileage to be gained from a problem after it has been solved!
      Remember they just wanted to keep milking the Babri Masjid Ram Mandir fiasco till PVNR called their bluff and actively prevented police from controlling the crowd bringing down that edifice.
      Later they let the area languish until the Supreme court pretty much shamed them into letting them build the Mandir.
      And now the same with Pakistan. Musharaff fulfilled his end of tampering down hostilities in Pakistan. The subsequent failed PMs of Pakistan sought Kashmir 2.0 to distract from their own failures
      However Modi was handed a relatively placid Kashmir but he likely turned into an inferno by design.
      This way like arsonist who calls the fire department to get a commendation from city, he yearns for credit in getting it back to 2007 levels of civility.
      PoK as of now is out of the question.
      Anyway as you pointed out, Pakistan is falling apart. As Napolean said- dont interfere the enemy when it is making a mistake.
      I wont go as tinfoil hat as to say that Modi would wish to save Pakistan so that he has a punching bag that he is accustomed to distract the populace. But I am saying that it wouldnt surprise me.

      Delete
    9. Ysv
      Yup i agree bdesh has a better culture but the recent decision of becoming constitutionally islamic is something that brings them down to the same pathetic standards.

      Regarding your take on indian economy and modi effect,i think despite the slog in white collar job creation modi has successfully managed india through the covid lockdown and subsequent recession hitting many nations. For one thing,India's supply line never failed wrt to both essential and nonessential items and even to remotest corners,but we saw this happening across the world in multiple advanced nations. Also the fact that emerging economies like srilanka and bdesh were being hailed as new light before these ended up showing true colours(srilanka showing a bit more colour than bdesh but latter is pretty much in line as well with huge power cuts,inflation etc,and as for pakistan it was a doomed nation anyway so not considering Pak under emerging category),makes me feel that maybe whatever modi has done is underappreciated on the economic front,i mean stability in a crisis might in itself be an achievement though it tends to get overlooked once crisis period goes away. One thing GOI since Modi era has been doing strongly is the aspect of fiscal discipline.

      Delete
    10. The fact that you have to bring up the situation of Pakistan, Sri Lank and Bangladesh to make India look good in comparision actually makes it look even more pitiful. India is supposed to leagues ahead of these countries and competing with South East Asian states such as Malaysia and Indonesia in terms of economy, living standards and development but here we are patting ourselves on the back for not going bankrupt like Sri Lanka.
      Sri Lanka made a lot of errors of judgement, not least of which was listening to crackpot environmentalists which forced farmers to practice "organic" which led to a food catastrophe and the subsequent chaos and political instability.
      There are many countries which maintained a food supply chain and had no law and order problems in the aftermath of the pandemic India is not unique in that regard. India furthermore probably has more agriculturally fertile and productive area/sq km in the world. It was and is self sufficient in many consumer goods. All this was going on much before Modi.
      I suppose I should be grateful to him for not getting his grubby paws in to this and fucking it up. He has a natural talent for desroying anything he touches.

      Delete
    11. @YSV

      Isn't India's GDP growing at a rate of about 6% ? That could put us in the road of becoming as rich as Indonesia and Malaysia. I don't know much about this topic so wouldn't mind being corrected.

      Delete
    12. Not to mention our forex reserves that are at a historic high

      Delete
    13. @Premchand
      I think you are referring to the average growth rate since 1951 . Because for 2021 it was 8.7%
      Most countries recovering from the pandemic had a high growth rate. That is due to ...well negative 6% in 2020! When you start from the very bottom it is easy to have high growth rate. This is the reason why Americans are quite happy with 3 or 4% growth rate but not say Ethiopians. Rwanda in the early 00s often saw a 16% growth rate

      I read that there is a projected growth rate of 6% for the next two years. This is not satisfactory for a developing country such as India. It should be more along the lines of 9 to 10%.


      Re foreign reserves. It appears that India being self sufficient on essential goods didnt wish to strain its supply chain and funds with imports during the pandemic and to a lesser extant thereafter. Keep in mind many countries in the GCC are dependent on Indian agricultural produce and other commodities.
      That accounts for trade surplus reflected in the reserves.Though some of the forex has been used to artificially prop up the Rupee.

      A lot of regional governments not just in the south but Bengal and Bihar have invested considerably in infrastructure ,power grid and transportation in order to attract investment and jobs.
      Heck in the case of AP , they did it despite Modi.
      My point was that India should have been atleast close to these countries by now.
      Manmohans relative inertia and Modis bungling led us to the situation we are in today.

      Delete
  6. Before 2014 terrorist attacks were a norm. It was part of our lives. Normalcy. Now they are completely gone. A teenager has no idea what that era felt like. That credit goes to modi regime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm not really. Terrorist attacks were on the wane since around 2004 when Americans told Pakistanis to cut it out. 2008 was the last hurrah. NOtice it occurred during the lame duck period of Bush ,just idling the days before Obama would attain the office.

      Modi for sure did tighten the screws a bit but there was not much left to do .

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ajit Vadakayil: Deranged lunatic

Why are our super patriots so insecure?

Nationalism vs Religion Dichotomy: A response to Sagar M